...more precisely, EPR is equivalent to ER...
Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind wrote a cool paper attacking the horizons of our current understanding of quantum gravity which may look convoluted if not entangled to many readers, which may swallow your attention like a black hole, and which is called
Cool horizons for entangled black holes.
I suppose that the paper was created after Juan Maldacena explained to Lenny Susskind why his recent
pro-firewall paper was wrong. Both Maldacena and Susskind have thought about similar things for quite some time but there are many reasons – including my knowledge of the genesis of
this modest paper – why I think that the active claims and "choices of the right answers" are Juan's, not Lenny's. ;-)
Update: See also John Preskill's enthusiastic review of the paper.
Just very recently, Lenny was very confused about the firewalls and thought that the AMPS arguments have made firewalls inevitable. The new Maldacena-Susskind paper is clearly an anti-firewall paper. Well, they actually conclude that the firewalls don't have to be there but there may, depending on the decision of a female overlord whose identity will be partially clarified below...
Healfix finds the paper controversial, either wrong or the first salvo of a completely new revolution. I don't. The paper is cool but it's a totally natural continuation of the state of the affairs as we have known it for quite some time. It builds on
Werner Israel's thermofields (Werner Israel is an ex-collaborator of
our Gordon Wilson), Maldacena's 2001 comments about the "pair of CFTs" description of the
eternal AdS black hole, and some ideas about "entanglement as a topology change" that I recently associated with
Mark Van Raamsdonk although many people, including your humble correspondent, have been thinking about the same paradigm for many years.
Ryu and Takayanagi have contributed an influential 2006 paper about the entanglement in the black hole context.
The ideas linked to thermofields and the doubling of degrees of freedom were recently mentioned and exploited by the
Raju-Papadodimas paper but again, it's true that a dozen of credible researchers or so has thought about these matters in this way.