Chinese communism is the best decision-making system
A widget-free version of this blog post is here...Bloomberg published a remarkable story yesterday:
Top Global Emitter China Best on Climate Change, Figueres Says (main link, click)The chairwoman of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change Ms Christiana Figueres of Costa Rica has concluded that "the political divide in the U.S. Congress has slowed efforts to pass climate legislation and is very detrimental to the fight against global warming" while "China is also able to implement policies because its political system avoids some of the legislative hurdles seen in countries including the U.S.".
The totalitarian system rocks while democracy sucks!
Well, I am sure that Adolf Hitler's one-party system would be even better for this "lady" than the Chinese one-party system if it were available. At any rate, democracy is the biggest enemy.
I hope that this story will open the eyes of many people who will be lucky to learn about it and who will realize that the actual goal of the climatism is to liquidate democracy, freedom, and prosperity in the world.
Even if you thought that it is a good idea to reduce the CO2 emissions (it's not), Figueres' totalitarian advertisements are indefensible by the struggle to reduce the CO2 emissions because China's CO2 emissions were actually growing significantly more quickly than America's emissions in recent years – and China overtook the U.S. as the world's #1 producer of CO2 six years ago or so (and I am not even talking about the real polution, a real problem, that remains brutal at many places of China).
It's the very ability of the one-party system to neutralize the opposition of any kind that is so intriguing for Ms Figueres and thousands of champions of the climate alarmism. It's what their talk about the "consensus" and the dissatisfaction with the "contrarians" is all about.
The goal of these people is to stop democracy, freedom, and prosperity regardless of the fate of Nature, the temperatures, or the CO2 concentrations.
According to the Czech law, the woman is involved in criminal activity because she is promoting movements aiming to suppress human rights, freedom, and democracy which is illegal here (this bill is perhaps a naive attempt not to repeat Nazism or communism that ruled us for 50% of the 20th century). I guess that she is just fine and safe in the New York City where people apparently believe that the main international organization, the U.N., with its top officials urging America to abandon democracy is not a threat.
Just to be sure, Ms Figueres, the "slow" negotiations in the U.S. Congress – known as democracy – are not detrimental at all. They are what keeps the society decent, what allows it to search and find a better solution among at least two, and what protects the society against power-thirsty and intolerant individuals like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, and yourself. The well-being of America is one of the arguments supporting the view that freedom and democracy are precious values that must be defended even if it goes against frantically worshiped pseudosciences such as eugenics, Lysenkoism, the cultural revolution, and the climate alarmism.
See also globalwarming.org.
Figueres isn't the first climate alarmist who praises the Chinese political system. She was preceded by Thomas Friedmann of the NYT, Nancy Pelosi 1/2, James Hansen, Al Gore, and others.
Off-topic: Click the image above for a semi-official Iranian (Farsnews) report claiming that some Snowden documents imply that Obama is controlled by the "Tall Whites", a race of extraterrestrial aliens that previously brought Hitler to power and allowed his empire to increase the production of weapons. Russia is said to be "stunned" by the findings. ;-) Maybe the Aryan white race weren't Nordic but extraterrestrial, after all. The most worrisome trouble, the last sentence reveals, is the possibility that America's or Obama's foes may have teamed up with another extraterrestrial race.
I suppose that it may be the case of the Iranians. At any rate, Obama and Kerry found it very important to sign a peace treaty with these complete nuts and legitimize their uranium enrichment. How can one disagree with the Israeli defense minister who pointed out that Kerry suffers from the messianic complex when he tries to impose his version of peace on Israel and Palestine? Obama's spokeswoman immediately pointed out that Obama himself is behind Kerry's Palestinian policies. That hasn't improved the situation, I guess, unless bullying of an ally is called an improvement.