Wednesday, April 28, 2010 ... Deutsch/Español/Related posts from blogosphere

Alexa ranks of climate blogs

Willis Eschenbach has created a self-explanatory chart showing the traffic on climate blogs:



This chart was posted under an essay written by a guest blogger, Al Gore, on Anthony Watts' blog. You can see that WUWT is the most visited climate blog, ahead of Romm's blog, McIntyre's blog, RealClimate, Morano's portal, and DeSmogBlog.

The Reference Frame was sitting at the 13th spot, ahead of JunkScience, AlGore.COM, IceCap, and Tamino's blog. I didn't even know that Al Gore had a website: I thought he has just invented the Internet.




The comparison of the WUWT and Gore's traffic looks ridiculous - an elephant and an ant. If you don't know the relevant arithmetics, an ant is an alephant divided by the aleph, and all Aleph numbers are infinite. ;-) So it's better to choose two comparable players - Al Gore and your humble correspondent:



You see that we've been ahead of the alternative scientist throughout April but otherwise, this particular race seems to be neck and neck. You may see that Gore has bigger fluctuations.

At any rate, the message is that if you are a crackpot and if you want to compete with well-known scientific blogs, the only thing you need is to lose presidential elections and to shoot a movie about the imminent judgment day. Subsequent ideas of yours about the millions of degrees inside the soil will have the same impact as serious scientific analyses of others.

It's somewhat interesting to compare demographics of visitors to TRF and AlGore.COM.

Both websites are rarely visited by people with "no college" or "some college". While Gore's website has an overrepresentation of visitors with "college", TRF only has an overrepresentation of visitors with a "graduate school". ;-)

TRF is more often visited by people with children while Gore's website has those without children, TRF readers are more likely to be male while there's democracy on Gore's website, and TRF is more often read from homes while Gore's website is more likely to be read at work - a pretty expected difference. :-)

In the age categories of 45-54 and 65+ years, TRF has a clear overrepresentation while Gore's website has a clear underrepresentation. TRF has a clear underrepresentation in the 18-24 age group. Well, no, Paul Frampton, it doesn't seem like TRF is focusing on high-school drugheads.

So TRF is mostly read by old (white?) highly educated males while Gore's website is read by young (non-white?) marginally educated naive females and males.

Add to del.icio.us Digg this Add to reddit

snail feedback (2) :


reader Wee Willie Winkie said...

Excellent work Lubos.
Always handy to have a sideline!


reader Brian G Valentine said...

Good for you, Lubos

Very sorry to correct you, but "division" by infinite cardinals is not allowed.

You can add them

(aleph_o) + 1 = (aleph_o)

(aleph_o) + (aleph_o) + ... + = (aleph_o)

You can exponentiate them (defined by the Caresian product of the mappings)

(aleph_o)^2 = (aleph_o)

(aleph_o)^(aleph_o)=(aleph_o)

(aleph_o)^((aleph_1)=(aleph_1)

(continuum hypothesis) (aleph_1)=c, the cardinality of the continuum

(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o), m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m) })(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga'); ga('create', 'UA-1828728-1', 'auto'); ga('send', 'pageview');