Sunday, June 20, 2010

EU banned heated family houses built from 2020

The European Union has adopted a regulation that will ban the construction of ordinary family houses, starting from 2020. Only the so-called passive houses will be allowed:
iDNES.CZ (autom. transl. into EN), EU Business, EU Parliament, Euractiv, Panda.ORG, The Energy Collective;
Preliminary text of the directive (PDF)

For example, page 33/71 of the PDF document above says that all new buildings have to be "nearly zero-energy buildings" by the end of 2020. It has to be true by the end of 2018 for all new buildings occupied by public authorities.

One of the first passive houses in Darmstadt, Germany. The windows are obliged to go to the South. Also, it's not a coincidence that the house is ugly: ugly and "compact" houses are more energy efficient.

A passive house is essentially an ugly cube that covers its energy needs by a perpetual motion machine or something that has the same carbon footprint. Also, it's super perfectly isolated so that the CO2 you exhale by breathing will never get out of the house. The EU apparatchiks see another advantage in the passive houses: if you fart thrice during a harsh winter, you will either suffocate or freeze which will reduce the population growth.

At this moment, there only exist 15,000 of passive houses in the world, mostly in Germany, Austria, and Scandinavia. But they should suddenly become a majority. The construction of such an inferior passive house is 10-15 percent more expensive than the construction of a proper house. So what would you expect before 2020?

Japanese passive houses use people and fridges - rather than perpetual motion machines - to heat themselves. Note that the aesthetic quality is similar to the German one.

Well, people would realize that the ordinary houses will become a scarce, limited commodity and their price will jump at least by those 10-15 percent. Correspondingly, the construction of the classical houses will increase before 2020 because the developers will be able to sell a higher number of houses in a profitable way - because the price that the buyers will be ready to pay will increase, too.

However, don't expect that the existing owners will be completely protected against the new insane policies. If they want to sell or rent their house or apartment starting from 2012, they will have to get a document about the energy efficiency of the real estate - something that costs $500 or so.

Well, if this is the only problem for the existing owners, it is negligible and nothing changes about the scenario above. If this AGW-rooted reasoning (or the lack of it) manages to survive until 2020 and the regulation will be close to its activation, people will horde classic houses because they implicitly include the permission to use heating systems as we know them today.

Everyone may expect an EU apparatchik looking into your kettle at least once every four years.

Via Olda K.

A nice villa

This passive house looks pretty, doesn't it? Well, please accept my apologies, but it's because it's far from being passive. Instead, it's Al Gore's new villa in California. Click the picture to zoom in.

Related: Australia and North America
Stop the war on land owners, home owners, and shareholders


  1. I can tell you that the profile of these bunkers is much too high to withstand artillery fire. The Defense Minister should be relieved of duty immediately.

    In all seriousness, I congratulate the EU on reviving Soviet era residential architecture until now emulated only in North Korea and Cuba.

  2. I thought you were joking when I first saw the blockhouse photo. I thought it was a training house for firefighters. You know the ones they repeatedly douse with flammable liquids and ignite?

    Good grief. Unrepentent, unbridaled socialism should be permantenly banned from human civilisation.

    I advocate the universal adoption of the Indonesian punishment of caning for the crime of willful, stupifying ignorance.

  3. a perpetual motion machine? pretty sure no ones been able to invent that or even prove scientifically that its possible to create energy out of nothing....saw this article on infowars.

  4. that's just stupid ...
    I'm sure being passive has little to do with the style of the house.

  5. Dear animah, you're completely wrong. Please try to study at least the first introductory sentence about passive solar design (click).

    For example, on the Wikipedia page, the very first sentence says

    "Following passive solar building design techniques, where possible buildings are compact in shape to reduce their surface area, with windows oriented towards the equator (south in the northern hemisphere and north in the southern hemisphere) to maximize passive solar gain."

    It is no coincidence that the houses have no "structure" or "charm" and look like boring cubes. It minimizes the surface and therefore the heat loss. Highly energy-efficient houses have to be ugly.