Supersymmetric world from a conservative viewpoint
To be fair. Krugman's comment was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek.Not that he hasn't done his share to frag things up.
Dear Aaron,he may have tried to make the article more entertaining but the content was meant seriously. Check the fast comments where this is discussed.Until or unless you will provide at least an equally detailed justification of your hypothesis that it was tongue-in-cheek, and what he meant, is it OK for me to simply ignore your comment as a manifest and unjustified falsity? Thanks,Luboš
Yes. I don't know where I got the idea. And I can't find support for it. Unfortunately, I can't read the fast comments where I am (blocked), but I don't need to.
2005 follow up post: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E4D61039F934A15756C0A9639C8B63What I don't get is how he can advocate more easing now with "nothing to replace housing".