Monday, November 14, 2011 ... Deutsch/Español/Related posts from blogosphere

LHCb reports a new source of CP-violation

Well, just another 3-sigma hint that may go away

Mat Charles of Oxford gave a talk at HCP 2011 in Paris in which he reported a surprising result by LHCb at CERN based on 0.58/fb of their 2011 data.

Some CP-violating asymmetries \(A_{CP}\) are measured for the decays
\[ D^0 \to K^+ K^-, \quad D^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-. \] The asymmetries are defined as the ratio of difference and the sum of the partial decay rates for decays of the particle or its antiparticle to the other mesons:
\[ A_{CP}^{\pi{\rm \,\,or\,\,} K} = \frac{\Gamma(D^0\to f^+ f^-)-\Gamma(\bar D^0\to f^+ f^-)}{\Gamma(D^0\to f^+ f^-)+\Gamma(\bar D^0\to f^+ f^-)} \] where \(f^\pm=\pi^\pm\) or \(K^\pm\). This asymmetry is a "direct way" to access the CP-violation by particle collisions; an indirect way would be to look at the \(D^0\)-\(\bar D^0\) oscillations.

The difference between these two asymmetries \(\Delta A_{CP}=A_{CP}^{\pi} - A_{CP}^K\) computed for the decay channels of the charmed meson should be (almost but not quite exactly) zero according to the Standard Model (assuming that one properly adjusts the signs: I don't quite follow them right now): the only source of the CP-violation is the CKM complex phase.

However, the measured difference is
\[ \Delta A_{CP} = -0.82\% \pm 0.24\% \] which is roughly 3.4 standard deviations away from the prediction. The rumors described it as 3.5 sigma which was a slight overestimate. In the error, \(0.21\%\) is statistical and \(0.11\%\) is systematic (they were added in quadrature).

The discrepancy is visualized by the fact that the black theoretical SM dot at "zero" isn't sitting within the 1-sigma cyan experimental LHCb band.

Whether the deviation is a human error, a fluke, or a sign of new physics remains to be seen.

Via Phil Gibbs. See also Diaries Survivor, Resonaances, Cosmic Variance.

Add to Digg this Add to reddit

snail feedback (0) :

(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o), m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m) })(window,document,'script','//','ga'); ga('create', 'UA-1828728-1', 'auto'); ga('send', 'pageview');