Monday, August 06, 2012

Pakistani water-powered car

Update: Amer Iqbal recommended me three physicists' critical articles about this fraud, including his own. See Tribune I, Tribune II (his), Dawn.
During the weekend, I was informed by a Facebook contact of mine who lives on the Indian subcontinent that Pakistan is excited by the invention by Agha Waqar Ahmad, an engineer, who has "managed, by the grace of Allah, to produce a car that runs on water". While doing so, he was allegedly inspired by uranium enrichment scientist Qadeer Khan. See a "demonstration" of the "breakthrough" or a 40-minute TV program.

The new messiah of Pakistan. He made a Suzuki motorcycle that runs on a fuel you've been thinking about when you were in the kindergarten: water.

The nation that has gifted Abdus Salam, the co-father of the Standard Model, to the world has forgotten about its great scientist (well, he became unpopular because of some sectarian conflicts and his belonging to the "wrong" sect) as well as basic physics itself. Most people who have heard about the water-run gospel seem to be excited. First, do they have a reason?

We're told that you just pour a liter of water into his miraculous, Allah-sponsored engine and your tractor or your Suzuki motorcycle ;-) goes for miles and miles and miles. Much like in Andrea Rossi's case, the miracle is supposed to be helped by a catalyst.

To have an idea about the repercussions of the "invention", look e.g. at Pakistan Observer I and Pakistan Observer II. Of course, the excitement is much more intense in the media printed in the local language, Urdu (an implementation of Hindi). Whole mass rallies with slogan chanting to support the crackpot are being organized. Let's admit that there are also amusing parodies, rightfully harsh critics, e.g. in the Times of Pakistan, people demanding investigation and punishment for the crackpots, e.g. in The Pakistan Today, and skeptics offering money if it works, e.g. The Tribune PK. Disbelievers include a former science minister who challenged the "inventor": the disbeliever got instantly sued for "undermining the invention". ;-) The New York Times printed an OK story on this invention on Saturday. However, it seems clear to me which group is "winning the P.R. wars" in Pakistan and the answer isn't encouraging.

Just to be sure, the proposed engine violates the same law – the energy conservation law i.e. the first law of thermodynamics – as other perpetual motion machines in the most primitive category (some of them are shown in the video via Eytan S. [thanks] above; warning for non-physicists: the video involves some tricks, not true physics miracles). In particular, a catalyst isn't a compound that allows you to do similar miracles. A catalyst – and everything else in the Universe except for processes in cosmology – respects the energy conservation law. A true catalyst would only allow you to speed up a reaction by "lending" some energy to the chemical process. A potential barrier may be easier to be surpassed but at the end, both the catalyst and the energy that was invested has to get out.

If you talk about the splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen, then this is the reaction:\[

2 H_2 O + 1.23\eV \leftrightarrow 2H_2 + O_2

\] The unit of energy is \(1\eV=1.602\times 10^{-19}\,{\rm J}\). I would like to hope that the indicated energy is right (for water solutions near pH 7.0: the energy counting would be different for different pH levels or in the vacuum) and shouldn't be multiplied by two. Please correct me if something is wrong.

At any rate, two water molecules may be rearranged into separated hydrogen and oxygen gas molecules (those elements like to form diatomic molecules) but if you want to "split" water into the individual elements, you need to invest some energy, \(1.23\eV\). You may do so e.g. if you apply voltage of \(1.23\,{\rm V}\) which is what gives each electron (or equally charged particle) the energy of \(1.23\eV\) when it moves in between the electrodes.

On the contrary, if you have hydrogen and oxygen, it is "good for you" because you may create not only water but also some energy per each water molecule. At any rate, each stationary configuration of molecules or any other objects has a certain energy that is entirely determined by the objects and their locations. If you want to rearrange the atoms into configurations with a higher energy – e.g. separate oxygen and hydrogen in our example – you must add some energy. If you want to go in the opposite direction, you may "earn" the same energy. But energy is never lost and it is never created out of nothing.

It is remarkable but ministers (who discuss it during the sessions of the government; the government promised the support for the "water as fuel" project), media persons, and even many people who are considered good Pakistani scientists have a problem with these basic propositions, with the energy conservation law that a bright enough schoolkid may start to understand when she is 10 years old or so. The IQ gap between the inability to understand the energy conservation law and the ability to become one of the world's first three people (well, two people, sorry, Shelly) who are able to write down the final equations of the electroweak theory of particle physics is just stunning. But this is exactly the gap between the top Pakistani scientists in the late 1960s and the "top" Pakistani scientists in the early 2010s. And knowing that a similar plain stupid nation possesses nuclear weapons is just scary.

The semi-religious (and partly religiously motivated) zeal of Waqar's fans is just amazing – and although we are talking about an underdeveloped nation, some of the observed features may be found in the West, too. Take e.g. the discussion under the Pakistan Observer II article. The first participant gives a simple and comprehensible explanation why those things can't work:
Electrolysis guy: The energy consumed in electrolysis of water to form hydrogen and oxygen would be greater than the energy produced by the combustion of formed hydrogen. What is the point of running the engine by hydrogen when same amount of petrol or diesel is being consumed to do electrolysis of water? As a nation we are a bunch of idiots, getting overly excited by a failed idea. This also shamelessly exposes the level of our scientific understanding, and our dumb 'scientists' are no exception.
Exactly. The degree of excitement about this self-evident piece of rubbish does show the lower level of education of the Pakistani nation – and even the Pakistani establishment. To obtain water-related fuels, i.e. hydrogen and oxygen, you have to do electrolysis but the energy you insert into it is the same one you get out. Well, you get out less than that due to losses etc.

You could think that the comment above is uncontroversial among people from civilized places – colleges or the industrial center in Lahore. However, this is what two people from a medical college and Lahore respectively replied:
Medical college: we r not idiots I GUESS YOU ARE.. who cant understand THERE's difference IN PETROL and water.. PETROL is very very very expensive to get ON the other hand WATER is present EVERYWHERE.. we have SEA here

IF YOU CANT admire for GOD SAKE dont say BAD abt anything.. SHAME ON YOU..

Lahore: Yea Pakistan definitely need pessimistic people like you... who would just sit on their asses and criticize others... At least someone made an effort! learn to appreciate it.
Holy cow. And you find tons of similar comments about the people's pride in the "great invention", about the coming process of lowering carbon dioxide emissions (be sure that this dominant Western-produced rubbish just can't be absent when a religiously tainted crackpottery related to energy is being discussed), and lots of other things.

Note that the stupid folks – who may also be identified by their faulty capitalization in almost all but not all cases – totally ignore what the electrolysis guy tried to teach them. They are not interested in it. Much like the Shmoit-brainwashed crackpots, they are not interested in science, scientific answers, possibilities allowed by the laws of physics, constraints imposed by the laws of physics, or scientific explanations in general. Instead, they are obsessed with constantly parroting predetermined dogmas composed of entirely worthless crap but it must also be crap that is apparently very satisfactory for their taste sensors. The medical guy incorrectly conjectures that they are not idiots – well, they definitely are. Claiming to be able to distinguish petrol from water wouldn't be sufficient for not being an idiot. However, the medical guy is clearly incapable even of this modest achievement. More importantly, he fails to understand that water's lower price relatively to gasoline isn't a sufficient condition for its hypothesized ability to become a useful fuel. ;-)

Both the medical guy and the Lahore guy offer us some perspective into the mental processes inside the skulls of similar bigots. The people are expected to "admire", at least for "God's sake", and if they don't admire the crackpot engineer – or anyone who screams "Allah", for that matter – they must absorb "shame on them".

The Lahore guy also shows that what is intolerable is "pessimism". Saying that some ambitious physics claims painting a rosy future are scientific nonsense classifies as "pessimism" so the electrolysis guy is automatically a heretic.

If you read the reactions of other fans of the crackpot engineer, you will also notice that they love if the laws of physics are spitted upon, especially by someone who loves to say that Allah is greater than the laws. Now, it's great to question the current idea about the laws of physics and even the ideas about physics that haven't changed since the 18th century. However, in science, you must also allow other things to be questioned – such as the assumption that an "engineer" who screams about Allah's greatness actually has something useful and valid to be offered to his nation or the world.

If you start to be much more excited about the questioning of the insights accumulated by science than about your religious belief in a rosy future and/or in a miracle that was just claimed to have taken place, and even if you just decide to selectively listen to the "news" and "arguments" with a particular sign only (e.g. only to the optimistic news about the future sources of energy), then you're on your speedy way away from the scientific attitudes, away from a sustainable modern civilization based on science and technology.

Pakistan may be led by certain people who are partly viewed as allies of the U.S. and the West in general but I think it is unreasonable to assume that this is the permanent state of affairs. There are lots of crazy people, whether their craziness boils down to totally uneducated opinions about physics or pure religion or their bizarre combinations, and they are likely to ultimately regain the control of their state. And it won't be pretty so we should better be ready for that event.

At the end, of course, Pakistan itself isn't my main concern. I think that this story provides the West with a mirror in which we may see the caricature of our own crazy behavior. The uncritical reception of sensationalist claims by people with the ambitions of the Messiahs may look like a symptom of an underdeveloped society; but it may be a disease that Pakistan has de facto imported from the West, too.


  1. Let's tell the Pakistanis that it only works on holy water ;-)

  2. Lubos,

    perhaps they're importing their water from the Gulf, near the Deepwater Horizon?

  3. Lubos: Don't these people realize that water is a dangerous toxin. Using Al Gore logic and intellect, water is H2O----and H is the first letter in H-bomb and too much oxygen will kill you. We have to stop cars from running on this dangerous pollutant. (I think you mentioned the Penn and Teller "bullshit" but can't remember---Hippies signing a petition to ban water-)

  4. I know and love this - and I've watched dozens of episodes of Bullshit, actually. ;-)

  5. In a sarcastic article published in The Express Tribune, Pervez Hoodbhoy, chairman, department of applied physics at Pakistan's top most university, not only called it a fraud, but also pointed out the stupidity of politicians, journalist and public R&D heads in the capital. It is worth mentioning that before Agha Waqar Ahmed, another Pakistani known as Doctor Ghulam Sarwar had claimed in December 2011 that he had invented a car that only runs on water. However, and just in case, I will send an order for a cabrio... :-)

  6. Don't let them know about dihydrogen monoxide;-)

  7. Dear Pepo, when you're buying anything from these crooks, please don't end up as this guy who bought a cheap "iPhone" in Turkey:|en&tbb=1&ie=windows-1250

  8. Like the dangers of bicarbon monoxide?

  9. OK, have a look at this respectable research:


    The key words "water" and "catalyst" are there. What is missing from the description of the paskistani machine is the "solar" energy input. It seems that the catalist the Nocera group found using solar energy splits the H2O efficiently enough to get power out of it.

    All over the world there are people who think if they learn the terminology they have the knowledge , even in HEP.

  10. Dear Anna, hydrogen as a fuel is of course standard and has been used in space research etc. for decades. But this Pakistani guy is claiming to split the water molecules for free and that's a difference, indeed. ;-)

    I think he must be a deliberate fraudster. Not sure how otherwise he could convince himself that he's burning water to move cars.

  11. get your facts straight, you pathetic illiterate, bastard,
    Urdu is not an implementation of Hindi , if you don't know keep your fucking mouth shut, don't let meaning less garbage come out of it.

  12. its a good article, but kinda tl;dr

  13. I rather the cold fusion powered car , much more power with the energy of the sun , and the technology is so efficient the don't let any heat escapes all is useful energy , that is why the fusion is cold

  14. ROTFLMAO. Thank you, Luboš, for not deleting Warsi's screed.

  15. The 1.23V is the potential required for the reaction. But there are two bonds to break, in H2O, so it's 2x the 1.23eV energy required per molecule.

  16. As the resident paranormal expert on this blog, I feel reluctantly behoven to make some much needed informed comments on the subject. I inquired into a similar phenomenon in Australia some years ago (see Joe Cell on internet) and assume for the sake of argument that similar principles are at work in this case.

    Although I don't know anything about Mr. Ahmad I would assume also for the sake of argument that he is not a fraud. Since he is described as some sort of engineer I would also assume that he is able to determine for himself and others that his car is travelling from point A to B without any petrol in the tank.

    If this is the case, then what is happening? It certainly isn't electrolysis, chemical reactions or (I assume) some sort of cold fusion or other type of alleged nuclear reaction.

    Here we must leave proper science for the time being and step into the realm of the speculative unknown but take for our guidance various anecdotal observations.

    My opinion is that the universe of the known laws of physics is in a default state in which it is happy to stay as long as certain strange things are not done to it. These things involve heretical concepts such as, for want of a better description, intelligent or quasi-intelligent psychic fields which can in fact create matter and energy out of themselves.

    It is the interaction of Mr Ahmad's own personal psychic field with the material peculiarities of the device(s) he has constructed which is actually creating the effect. Mr. Ahmad may in fact not be fully aware of this himself, although I would predict that he has some sort of history of psychic gifts of one sort or another.

    The effects only occur when these fields, which are local to Mr. Ahmad, are aligned and ordered in the correct way. These fields have aligned for Mr. Ahmad either by chance or because he has a particular unconscious psychic talent. Therefore it is extremely unlikely that similar devices constructed for others or by others will work. The psychic field(s) associated with the general population are highy disordered and will destroy the effect.

    The religious and other hysteria involved are quite normal and a feature of this phenomenon The devices are, after all, running on a technical version of the Holy Spirit.

    Casper is of course confident that he has a way of realigning the psychic field of the general population. Please send your earmarked donations to Lubos whom I am sure will insist that they are spent in the appropriate scientific manner.

  17. Similar people's having nuclear weapons is frightening.

  18. I'm prepared to offer up to 10% commission on any donations towards my messianic plans for world domination.

  19. hello mr. warsi are u a spook person of mr.waqar....... how u know so much knowledge about waqars water kit.... even Waqar in his intervews sees that he did not know even about his his kit, why are you supporting him he admit he dont have any workshop of his own, while sitting in a small town how he able to do so much electronic works to get a very high tech kit ???? yes u have very good knowledge abut this technology by grace of internet........but it is impossible to get in reality

  20. Thanks for your awesome post.

    broken iPhone

  21. This is the greatest invention in mankind history & it does not
    violates any law of science but there are Jealous beasts who are telling
    lies to people by saying that car cannot be run by electrolysis. These
    fools even do not understand that Agha is using distilled water and
    electrolysis cannot be activated with distilled water. He has invented
    COMPLETE New Technique that cracks water into gases easily & does
    not consume Car battery more that car radio consumes. For details
    contact us