Sunday, October 07, 2012 ... Deutsch/Español/Related posts from blogosphere

ATLAS: some small multijet excesses

Well, multijets with 1 lepton and MET

All the observations at the LHC are so far consistent with the Standard Model, including the \((125.7\pm 0.5)\GeV\) Higgs boson. Well, kind of. There are some possibly emerging hints of deviations.

Google's doodle celebrates Niels Bohr's birthday on October 7th, 1885.

Multilepton and multijet excesses belong among the "so far small anomalies" that people like me carefully watch. And ATLAS just gave us a new reason to watch multijets today because they released the following preprint:

Search for supersymmetry at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\TeV\) in final states with large jet multiplicity, missing transverse momentum and one isolated lepton with the ATLAS detector
The paper officially announces that the analysis based on the 2011 dataset is consistent with the Standard Model. However, the consistency isn't as good as you may be expecting. The data are actually pretty interesting.

Well, most figures (including Figures 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) show some excesses – getting somewhat close to 2 sigma. Let's look at Figure 6, for example.

You see that the region beneath the thick crimson curve was excluded – but one actually expected to exclude a larger region, up to the dashed blue line above it. They're within 1+ theoretical sigma away from each other. Still, the decrease of the crimson full curve in the middle of the graph looks somewhat steep – as if the exclusion curve were trying to avoid the point\[

m_0=1,500\GeV,\quad m_{1/2}=300\GeV

\] or a nearby point. I want to suggest to the optimistic reader that MSUGRA/cMSSM with these parameters could have something to do with the reality.

If you look at previous TRF blog entries on multijets and multileptons, you will see that the multilepton remarks dominate. However, you will discover a multijet CMS excess although it was based on the tiny 2010 dataset only.

Nanopoulos et al. have actually been somewhat excited about the 9-jet signals as a possible sign of their favorite "aromatic" \({\mathcal F}-SU(5)\) model.

There's obviously no smoking fun in the new ATLAS paper based on the 2011 data but if the excesses are real, then the collisions that have already been recorded should be enough for a 4-sigma bump or so.

Sometimes in November, at the Kyoto conference, Incandela of CMS promised a "small package of updates". However, both CMS and ATLAS probably only plan to release fully updated analyses with the whole 2012 dataset sometime in 2013.

Stay tuned. ;-)

Add to Digg this Add to reddit

snail feedback (4) :

reader Dilaton said...

I dont know why this is, but I often find the TRF interpretation of such plots much more interesting and appealing than what the authors of the paper themself say ... ;-)


reader Peter F. said...

I am not surprised you do, because AFAIK this is the best of all 'physics+' blogs! :-)

reader Sam Telfer said...

Off topic: Hi Lumo, I know you're vehemently against any ToE that is stringy but I just wondered if you have any thoughts about this new paper: (Which I decrovered via:

reader Luboš Motl said...

Dear Sam, your description of what I am against is misleading. It suggests I am vehemently against theories *because* they are stringy. The reality is that I am vehemently against theories that are demonstrably wrong and it just happens that non-stringy theories beyond QFT are wrong.

I had invited the author of the very paper you mentioned, Xiao-Gang Wen, from MIT to Harvard to give a talk at a seminar that I organized so I assure you that I have always allowed those people to be heard. I can still explain to you whether it unifies light and electrons or not but your introduction isn't the right one.

(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o), m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m) })(window,document,'script','//','ga'); ga('create', 'UA-1828728-1', 'auto'); ga('send', 'pageview');