tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post113442084582662195..comments2020-03-13T03:28:45.250+01:00Comments on The Reference Frame: Riemann's hypothesisLuboš Motlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17487263983247488359noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-61663133676643614652014-02-13T16:39:32.805+01:002014-02-13T16:39:32.805+01:00Güncel ve temiz içeriği ile 87e porno bekleriz.Güncel ve temiz içeriği ile <a href="http://www.87e.net" rel="nofollow"> 87e porno</a> bekleriz.fikretnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-16972381658390463852012-07-14T12:44:46.317+02:002012-07-14T12:44:46.317+02:00Dear Jose, please don't be silly. Riemann xi f...Dear Jose, please don't be silly. Riemann xi function is, up to trivial rational factors, powers of pi, and a gamma function, the very same thing as the Riemann zeta function, so it has the same nontrivial zeros.<br /><br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_Xi_functionLuboš Motlhttp://motls.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-5543347333794449732012-07-14T12:18:00.049+02:002012-07-14T12:18:00.049+02:00it depends on the argument of the Riemann xi funct...it depends on the argument of the Riemann xi function which can be calculated by Riemann Siegel without evaluating any primes or Riemann zerosJose Javier Garcia Moretahttp://www.facebook.com/josejavier.garciamoretanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-41136438944446806072012-07-12T15:31:21.460+02:002012-07-12T15:31:21.460+02:00Sorry, if I understand well, your Hamiltonian is t...Sorry, if I understand well, your Hamiltonian is the usual QM kinetic energy p^2/2 plus potential energy and the potential energy is related to the zeta function itself again, right? So it's circular reasoning because something will fail to work if RH is false, won't it?Luboš Motlhttp://motls.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-69947192350701159862012-07-12T13:02:20.141+02:002012-07-12T13:02:20.141+02:00http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0069v3.pdf Riemann xi fu...http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0069v3.pdf Riemann xi function is the determiannt of a certain Hamiltonian operatorJose Javier Garcia Moretahttp://www.facebook.com/josejavier.garciamoretanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-83453322462704649662012-07-12T12:48:42.475+02:002012-07-12T12:48:42.475+02:00Riemann Hypothesis can be proved since the Riemann...Riemann Hypothesis can be proved since the Riemann Xi function is the determinant of a Hamiltonian operator with a certain potential<br /><br /><br />see for example : http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0069v3.pdf<br /><br /><br />the Riemann-Weil trace formula (distributional) is just the trace of Tr(d(E-H) here d(x) is a delta functionJose Javier Garcia Moretahttp://www.facebook.com/josejavier.garciamoretanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-1134491143677791172005-12-13T17:25:00.000+01:002005-12-13T17:25:00.000+01:00Were you being humourous again?By my speculation a...Were you being humourous again?<BR/><BR/>By my speculation alone I would have liked to have seen the ideas that you might have been working? It is equally well, that many would say you would deserve the million, before others might get it.<BR/><BR/>And imagine, mathematically eliminating the challenge of those who thought stringy theory no structure? Zeros on a line?<BR/><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._H._Hardy" REL="nofollow"><I>Non-mathematicians usually know him for two things.A Mathematician's Apology, his essay from 1940 on the aesthetics of mathematics (ISBN 0521427061) with some personal content — which is often considered the layman's best insight into the mind of a working mathematician. <B>His relationship as mentor from 1914 on of the Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan has become celebrated</B>. Hardy almost immediately recognized Ramanujan's extraordinary albeit untutored brilliance. Hardy and Ramanujan became close collaborators. In an interview by Paul Erdős, when Hardy was asked what his greatest contribution to mathematics was, Hardy unhesitatingly replied that it was the discovery of Ramanujan. He called their collaboration "the one romantic incident in my life."</I></A>Legacy Userhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01554579710459395706noreply@blogger.com