tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post2603856469854482296..comments2021-04-08T20:46:06.023+02:00Comments on The Reference Frame: Schrödinger's virus and decoherenceLuboš Motlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17487263983247488359noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-56010273483262218602009-09-26T13:41:05.988+02:002009-09-26T13:41:05.988+02:00Particle physics is leading to the quantum field t...Particle physics is leading to the quantum field theory correlation function for the virtual force photons' map on the spacetime volume of an atom. This deals with the Schrodinger wavefunction, and as "Schrodinger's Virus and Decoherence" points out, there are several interesting continuations. One productive result is the relative quantum expansion with the correlation function solution. It solves the Schrodinger wavefunction for one atom.<br /> The atom's RQT (relative quantum topological) data point imaging function is built by combination of the relativistic Einstein-Lorenz transform functions for time, mass, and energy with the workon quantized electromagnetic wave equations for frequency and wavelength. The atom labeled psi (Z) pulsates at the frequency {Nhu=e/h} by cycles of {e=m(c^2)} transformation of nuclear surface mass to forcons with joule values, followed by nuclear force absorption. This radiation process is limited only by spacetime boundaries of {Gravity-Time}, where gravity is the force binding space to psi, forming the GT integral atomic wavefunction. The expression is defined as the series expansion differential of nuclear output rates with quantum symmetry numbers assigned along the progression to give topology to the solutions.<br /> Next, the correlation function for the manifold of internal heat capacity particle 3D functions condensed due to radial force dilution is extracted; by rearranging the total internal momentum function to the photon gain rule and integrating it for GT limits. This produces a series of 26 topological waveparticle functions of five classes; {+Positron, Workon, Thermon, -Electromagneton, Magnemedon}, each the 3D data image of a type of energy intermedon of the 5/2 kT J internal energy cloud, accounting for all of them. <br /> Those values intersect the sizes of the fundamental physical constants: h, h-bar, delta, nuclear magneton, beta magneton, k (series). They quantize nuclear dynamics by acting as fulcrum particles. The result is the picoyoctometric, 3D, interactive video atomic model data imaging function, responsive to keyboard input of virtual photon gain events by relativistic, quantized shifts of electron, force, and energy field states and positions.<br /> Images of the h-bar magnetic energy waveparticle of ~175 picoyoctometers are available online at http://www.symmecon.com with the complete RQT atomic modeling guide titled The Crystalon Door, copyright TXu1-266-788. TCD conforms to the unopposed motion of disclosure in U.S. District (NM) Court of 04/02/2001 titled The Solution to the Equation of Schrodinger.<br />(C) 2009, Dale B. Ritter, B.A.Dale Ritterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10225253084255949037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-17542968517303301542009-09-15T06:19:30.115+02:002009-09-15T06:19:30.115+02:00Eliezer Yudkowsky's Quantum Physics Sequence g...Eliezer Yudkowsky's <a href="http://lesswrong.com/lw/r5/the_quantum_physics_sequence/" rel="nofollow">Quantum Physics Sequence</a> gave a pretty good explanation for laymen. At least as far as this layman can tell!TGGPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11017651009634767649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-91622454546247560892009-09-13T10:00:29.138+02:002009-09-13T10:00:29.138+02:00Mike,
I forgot to say: this text about contextual...Mike,<br /><br />I forgot to say: <a href="http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/01/bohmists-segregation-of-primitive-and.html" rel="nofollow">this text about contextual and other observables</a> explains one key aspect of QM that people like Palmer don't understand, namely that all observables are and must be treated by the same mathematical structure.<br /><br />All classical quantities are promoted to linear operators, all of them have a spectrum (eigenvalues), all these eigenvalues can only be predicted probabilistically (probabilities of different outcomes), no eigenvalue exists for "certain" prior to the measurement, and all these basic postulates are true and must be inevitably true regardless of the spectrum's discreteness, continuity, or mixed character. <br /><br />Also, it doesn't matter whether one can create a good Bohmian model for a given observable or not. All of observables - operators - in quantum mechanics (and in our real quantum world) are equally "real" or "unreal".<br /><br />Cheers<br />LMLuboš Motlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17487263983247488359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-24479854270662206812009-09-13T09:54:13.548+02:002009-09-13T09:54:13.548+02:00Dear Mike,
thanks for your compliments. The Palme...Dear Mike,<br /><br />thanks for your compliments. The Palmer preprint is <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.1148" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">here</a> (click).<br /><br />It's the kind of words about a new picture of quantum mechanics that unifies it with the emergent geometry and clarifies everything blah blah blah - that may occur sometimes in the future.<br /><br />However, this particular paper looks like another confused diatribe about Bohmian mechanics - with fractals etc. un-quantitatively added to the mixture - so I'm not gonna study it in detail. (It has 0 citations, so I am probably not the only one who decides in this way.)<br /><br />Best wishes<br />LubošLuboš Motlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17487263983247488359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-65757353768890874242009-09-13T02:54:13.551+02:002009-09-13T02:54:13.551+02:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8666091.post-71316550200257875752009-09-12T15:02:14.765+02:002009-09-12T15:02:14.765+02:00Dear Lubos,
thanks so much for this post.
I'v...Dear Lubos,<br />thanks so much for this post.<br /><br />I've been frustrated by hand waving about "wave function collapse" for so many years and now I have something that at least makes sense. I have to read it a few times more to make sure I really get it.John Ritsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15307430242180058186noreply@blogger.com